<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 1596 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306697</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that although there were some valid concerns regarding the Appellant&#039;s lack of disclosure of related party transactions and ICDs, the punishment imposed was deemed excessive. The Tribunal overturned part of the punishment imposed and partially allowed the appeal, ultimately disposing of all appeals with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2023 02:49:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=705139" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 1596 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306697</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that although there were some valid concerns regarding the Appellant&#039;s lack of disclosure of related party transactions and ICDs, the punishment imposed was deemed excessive. The Tribunal overturned part of the punishment imposed and partially allowed the appeal, ultimately disposing of all appeals with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>SEBI</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306697</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>