<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (8) TMI 922 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306702</link>
    <description>The High Court of Madras found a violation of procedural requirements under Section 75(4) of the Tamil Nadu Goods and Service Tax Act 2017. The impugned orders were quashed, and the writ petitions were allowed. The matters were remitted to the respondents for fresh orders with a directive to issue a personal hearing notice to the petitioners. No costs were awarded, and the connected miscellaneous petitions were closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2023 02:49:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=705137" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (8) TMI 922 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306702</link>
      <description>The High Court of Madras found a violation of procedural requirements under Section 75(4) of the Tamil Nadu Goods and Service Tax Act 2017. The impugned orders were quashed, and the writ petitions were allowed. The matters were remitted to the respondents for fresh orders with a directive to issue a personal hearing notice to the petitioners. No costs were awarded, and the connected miscellaneous petitions were closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306702</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>