<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (12) TMI 23 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31867</link>
    <description>The appeals were dismissed as the Tribunal found that the assessment orders lacked explicit findings on concealment of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars as required by the Full Bench decision in CIT v. Rampur Engineering Co. Ltd. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of the Assessing Officer&#039;s satisfaction being clearly documented in the assessment order for valid initiation of penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=70513" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (12) TMI 23 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31867</link>
      <description>The appeals were dismissed as the Tribunal found that the assessment orders lacked explicit findings on concealment of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars as required by the Full Bench decision in CIT v. Rampur Engineering Co. Ltd. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of the Assessing Officer&#039;s satisfaction being clearly documented in the assessment order for valid initiation of penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31867</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>