https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306693 The court analyzed an acknowledgment in a document regarding a mortgage debt, focusing on whether it constituted a valid acknowledgment affecting the limitation period for filing suit. The court emphasized the need for a clear acknowledgment without indications of discharge for validity. It held that the lower court's decision on acknowledgment was erroneous, allowing the second appeal, setting aside the previous decision, and restoring the trial court's judgment with costs. The case outcome emphasized the importance of a clear acknowledgment for a valid acknowledgment of liability in determining the subsistence of a debt liability and its impact on the limitation period. en-us Fri, 06 Aug 1948 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 18 Feb 2023 11:18:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306693 The court analyzed an acknowledgment in a document regarding a mortgage debt, focusing on whether it constituted a valid acknowledgment affecting the limitation period for filing suit. The court emphasized the need for a clear acknowledgment without indications of discharge for validity. It held that the lower court's decision on acknowledgment was erroneous, allowing the second appeal, setting aside the previous decision, and restoring the trial court's judgment with costs. The case outcome emphasized the importance of a clear acknowledgment for a valid acknowledgment of liability in determining the subsistence of a debt liability and its impact on the limitation period. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 06 Aug 1948 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306693