<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (2) TMI 713 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434198</link>
    <description>The court held that the reassessment proceedings were based on a change of opinion and lacked new tangible material, failing to comply with the jurisdictional foundation under section 147 of the Income Tax Act. Consequently, the notice for reopening the assessment and the order disposing of objections were set aside. The petition was allowed with no costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2023 06:50:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=705077" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (2) TMI 713 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434198</link>
      <description>The court held that the reassessment proceedings were based on a change of opinion and lacked new tangible material, failing to comply with the jurisdictional foundation under section 147 of the Income Tax Act. Consequently, the notice for reopening the assessment and the order disposing of objections were set aside. The petition was allowed with no costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434198</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>