https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434171 The tribunal upheld the decisions of the CIT(A) and Assessing Officer in dismissing the appellant's appeal for the assessment year 2010-2011. The appellant's grievances regarding the disallowances under sec.14A r.w. Rule 8D(2)(iii) and the sales promotion expenses at JW Marriot Hotel were rejected. The tribunal found no merit in the appellant's contentions and affirmed the disallowances, stating that the appellant failed to provide sufficient evidence to support their claims. en-us Thu, 05 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 18 Feb 2023 06:49:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434171 The tribunal upheld the decisions of the CIT(A) and Assessing Officer in dismissing the appellant's appeal for the assessment year 2010-2011. The appellant's grievances regarding the disallowances under sec.14A r.w. Rule 8D(2)(iii) and the sales promotion expenses at JW Marriot Hotel were rejected. The tribunal found no merit in the appellant's contentions and affirmed the disallowances, stating that the appellant failed to provide sufficient evidence to support their claims. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 05 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434171