<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (12) TMI 19 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31859</link>
    <description>The court held that the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) must grant an oral hearing before determining the Arm&#039;s Length Price (ALP) for international transactions, as required by Section 92CA(3) of the Act. Failure to do so violates principles of natural justice and renders the decision invalid. The court set aside impugned orders in multiple cases due to various procedural irregularities, directing the TPO to restart proceedings from the show cause notice stage, allowing petitioners to present evidence and have a personal hearing. Compliance with fair procedures and disclosure of relevant information were emphasized throughout the judgments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2013 09:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=70505" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (12) TMI 19 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31859</link>
      <description>The court held that the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) must grant an oral hearing before determining the Arm&#039;s Length Price (ALP) for international transactions, as required by Section 92CA(3) of the Act. Failure to do so violates principles of natural justice and renders the decision invalid. The court set aside impugned orders in multiple cases due to various procedural irregularities, directing the TPO to restart proceedings from the show cause notice stage, allowing petitioners to present evidence and have a personal hearing. Compliance with fair procedures and disclosure of relevant information were emphasized throughout the judgments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31859</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>