https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434163 The court set aside the impugned order in a case involving the interception and seizure of gold, remanding the matter for re-adjudication. It found a lack of consideration by the authorities on the discretionary option under Section 125 of the Customs Act and the classification of the gold as restricted or prohibited. The petitioner was granted an opportunity to present their case, emphasizing the importance of consistency in decision-making by quasi-judicial bodies. The writ petition was disposed of without costs. en-us Fri, 27 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 18 Feb 2023 06:48:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434163 The court set aside the impugned order in a case involving the interception and seizure of gold, remanding the matter for re-adjudication. It found a lack of consideration by the authorities on the discretionary option under Section 125 of the Customs Act and the classification of the gold as restricted or prohibited. The petitioner was granted an opportunity to present their case, emphasizing the importance of consistency in decision-making by quasi-judicial bodies. The writ petition was disposed of without costs. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 27 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434163