<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (2) TMI 677 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434162</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s decision, confirming the revocation of the Customs Broker license and forfeiture of the security deposit. The appeal was dismissed, and no costs were awarded. The Tribunal found that the show cause notice was not time-barred, the principle of double jeopardy did not apply, and the Customs Broker had violated various regulations under CBLR, 2013, justifying the license revocation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2023 06:48:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=705041" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (2) TMI 677 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434162</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s decision, confirming the revocation of the Customs Broker license and forfeiture of the security deposit. The appeal was dismissed, and no costs were awarded. The Tribunal found that the show cause notice was not time-barred, the principle of double jeopardy did not apply, and the Customs Broker had violated various regulations under CBLR, 2013, justifying the license revocation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434162</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>