<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (2) TMI 660 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434145</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the order disallowing Cenvat credit. It held that the services were eligible input services, the credit distribution by the ISD complied with rules, and the extended limitation period was not applicable. Penalties were deemed unjustified due to lack of evidence of intent to evade duty. The importance of following judicial precedents and the appellant&#039;s bona fide belief was emphasized.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2023 06:45:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=705024" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (2) TMI 660 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434145</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the order disallowing Cenvat credit. It held that the services were eligible input services, the credit distribution by the ISD complied with rules, and the extended limitation period was not applicable. Penalties were deemed unjustified due to lack of evidence of intent to evade duty. The importance of following judicial precedents and the appellant&#039;s bona fide belief was emphasized.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434145</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>