<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (9) TMI 1475 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306681</link>
    <description>Section 13 of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 was construed as a restricted appellate code for commercial disputes, so intra-court appeal lies only where the Act expressly permits it; appeals outside the statutorily appealable category were held not maintainable, while appeals from a return of plaint and an injunction order fell within the permitted framework. On merits, a Chartered High Court may return a plaint under Section 151 CPC where the chosen forum lacks sufficient territorial nexus or is otherwise inappropriate. Applying that approach, the return of plaint in the trade mark suit was upheld, the injunction order was left substantially undisturbed, and the return of plaint in the damages suit was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2023 06:44:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=705001" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (9) TMI 1475 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306681</link>
      <description>Section 13 of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 was construed as a restricted appellate code for commercial disputes, so intra-court appeal lies only where the Act expressly permits it; appeals outside the statutorily appealable category were held not maintainable, while appeals from a return of plaint and an injunction order fell within the permitted framework. On merits, a Chartered High Court may return a plaint under Section 151 CPC where the chosen forum lacks sufficient territorial nexus or is otherwise inappropriate. Applying that approach, the return of plaint in the trade mark suit was upheld, the injunction order was left substantially undisturbed, and the return of plaint in the damages suit was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306681</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>