<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (11) TMI 1319 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306690</link>
    <description>The Delhi High Court closed the appeal while keeping the question of law open under Section 35R of the Central Excise Act, 1944, as the tax impact was below the monetary limit set by a circular. The proposal to file a special leave petition was rejected by the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs due to the monetary limit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2023 06:44:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=704998" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (11) TMI 1319 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306690</link>
      <description>The Delhi High Court closed the appeal while keeping the question of law open under Section 35R of the Central Excise Act, 1944, as the tax impact was below the monetary limit set by a circular. The proposal to file a special leave petition was rejected by the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs due to the monetary limit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306690</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>