<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (9) TMI 250 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31851</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal against the setting aside of a penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 1984-85. The Court emphasized the necessity of the Assessing Officer recording satisfaction in the assessment order to initiate penalty proceedings, as per the decision in a previous case. Despite a pending reference to a larger Bench, the Court found that the assessment order did not reflect the required satisfaction. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision and highlighting the importance of explicit satisfaction in the assessment order for penalty proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=70497" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (9) TMI 250 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31851</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal against the setting aside of a penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 1984-85. The Court emphasized the necessity of the Assessing Officer recording satisfaction in the assessment order to initiate penalty proceedings, as per the decision in a previous case. Despite a pending reference to a larger Bench, the Court found that the assessment order did not reflect the required satisfaction. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision and highlighting the importance of explicit satisfaction in the assessment order for penalty proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31851</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>