<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (2) TMI 622 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434107</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the impugned order by the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) was unsustainable. It determined that the imported Aluminium Alloy coils fell under the exclusion clause (vii) of Notification No. 23/2017-Cus (ADD) dated 16.5.2017, exempting them from anti-dumping duty. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the impugned order was set aside, providing consequential relief to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2023 17:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=704931" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (2) TMI 622 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434107</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the impugned order by the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) was unsustainable. It determined that the imported Aluminium Alloy coils fell under the exclusion clause (vii) of Notification No. 23/2017-Cus (ADD) dated 16.5.2017, exempting them from anti-dumping duty. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the impugned order was set aside, providing consequential relief to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434107</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>