<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (2) TMI 616 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434101</link>
    <description>The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) allowed the appeal under Section 421 of the Companies Act, 2013, setting aside the National Company Law Tribunal&#039;s (NCLT) order and directing the restoration of the company&#039;s name in the Register maintained by the Registrar of Companies. The NCLAT recognized the company&#039;s substantial assets and ongoing business operations despite the name being struck off, emphasizing compliance with statutory requirements. Restoration was subject to fulfilling specified conditions, including payment of costs and filing pending documents, to safeguard legal status and stakeholder interests.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2023 09:09:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=704922" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (2) TMI 616 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434101</link>
      <description>The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) allowed the appeal under Section 421 of the Companies Act, 2013, setting aside the National Company Law Tribunal&#039;s (NCLT) order and directing the restoration of the company&#039;s name in the Register maintained by the Registrar of Companies. The NCLAT recognized the company&#039;s substantial assets and ongoing business operations despite the name being struck off, emphasizing compliance with statutory requirements. Restoration was subject to fulfilling specified conditions, including payment of costs and filing pending documents, to safeguard legal status and stakeholder interests.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434101</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>