<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (2) TMI 614 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434099</link>
    <description>Where a constituted Appellate Tribunal can comprehensively examine a dispute arising from a provisional attachment under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, the High Court may decline to entertain a writ petition and direct the parties to pursue the statutory appeal there. The matter was relegated to the Tribunal because related appeals were already pending before it, and a single forum was needed to avoid parallel proceedings and conflicting rulings. The writ and accompanying stay application were treated as an appeal and stay request before the Tribunal, while existing interim protection was continued until the Tribunal decided the stay application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2023 16:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=704920" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (2) TMI 614 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434099</link>
      <description>Where a constituted Appellate Tribunal can comprehensively examine a dispute arising from a provisional attachment under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, the High Court may decline to entertain a writ petition and direct the parties to pursue the statutory appeal there. The matter was relegated to the Tribunal because related appeals were already pending before it, and a single forum was needed to avoid parallel proceedings and conflicting rulings. The writ and accompanying stay application were treated as an appeal and stay request before the Tribunal, while existing interim protection was continued until the Tribunal decided the stay application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434099</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>