<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 2298 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306648</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, directing the deletion of the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) due to the inadequacy of the penalty notice in specifying the nature of the offense. The appeal was allowed, and the decision was pronounced in open court on July 26, 2018.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2023 20:54:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=704890" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 2298 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306648</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, directing the deletion of the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) due to the inadequacy of the penalty notice in specifying the nature of the offense. The appeal was allowed, and the decision was pronounced in open court on July 26, 2018.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306648</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>