https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306659 Objections to the High Court's territorial jurisdiction, particularly where they depend on disputed facts, should ordinarily be raised in the written statement and tested on merits after pleadings and issues are framed. An application to revoke leave to institute the suit was therefore not the proper course for such a mixed question of law and fact. The Supreme Court held that the High Court should not have entertained the revocation application and should have allowed the defendants to contest jurisdiction in their defence. The impugned orders were set aside and the matter remitted for fresh decision in accordance with law. en-us Thu, 07 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 16 Feb 2023 20:54:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306659 Objections to the High Court's territorial jurisdiction, particularly where they depend on disputed facts, should ordinarily be raised in the written statement and tested on merits after pleadings and issues are framed. An application to revoke leave to institute the suit was therefore not the proper course for such a mixed question of law and fact. The Supreme Court held that the High Court should not have entertained the revocation application and should have allowed the defendants to contest jurisdiction in their defence. The impugned orders were set aside and the matter remitted for fresh decision in accordance with law. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 07 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306659