<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 1347 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306660</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s decision, finding the disciplinary authority&#039;s conclusions lacked sufficient evidence and the disciplinary enquiry was procedurally unfair. The penalty of dismissal was deemed disproportionate, leading to the direction for the employee&#039;s reinstatement with full benefits. The appeal was dismissed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2023 20:54:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=704885" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 1347 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306660</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the High Court&#039;s decision, finding the disciplinary authority&#039;s conclusions lacked sufficient evidence and the disciplinary enquiry was procedurally unfair. The penalty of dismissal was deemed disproportionate, leading to the direction for the employee&#039;s reinstatement with full benefits. The appeal was dismissed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306660</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>