<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (9) TMI 201 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306643</link>
    <description>A disciplinary charge-sheet is invalid if issued by an officer who lacked power to initiate proceedings at the time of issuance, and a later notification cannot cure that defect. Disciplinary findings must rest on evidence, not mere suspicion; a charge built only on suspicion cannot sustain punishment. Domestic enquiries must follow natural justice by giving notice of material witness testimony and an opportunity for cross-examination. Where the disciplinary authority proposes to differ from the enquiry report or impose a higher penalty, it must record reasons and give a meaningful opportunity to respond to both the findings and the proposed punishment. On these principles, the disciplinary action was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2023 15:37:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=704877" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (9) TMI 201 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306643</link>
      <description>A disciplinary charge-sheet is invalid if issued by an officer who lacked power to initiate proceedings at the time of issuance, and a later notification cannot cure that defect. Disciplinary findings must rest on evidence, not mere suspicion; a charge built only on suspicion cannot sustain punishment. Domestic enquiries must follow natural justice by giving notice of material witness testimony and an opportunity for cross-examination. Where the disciplinary authority proposes to differ from the enquiry report or impose a higher penalty, it must record reasons and give a meaningful opportunity to respond to both the findings and the proposed punishment. On these principles, the disciplinary action was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306643</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>