https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306640 Revisional interference under Section 115 CPC is confined to jurisdictional error, failure to exercise jurisdiction, or material irregularity, and an order refusing return of the plaint under Order 7 Rule 10 does not amount to final disposal of the suit merely because forum is affected. The court therefore would not interfere in revision on that basis. A plaint can be rejected under Order 7 Rule 11(d) only when the statutory bar is apparent from the plaint itself; where the bar under Sections 96 and 167 of the Gujarat Co-operative Societies Act depends on disputed facts, including whether the dispute touches the business of the society, summary rejection is unwarranted. The revision was dismissed and the suit was left to proceed. en-us Wed, 05 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 16 Feb 2023 12:03:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306640 Revisional interference under Section 115 CPC is confined to jurisdictional error, failure to exercise jurisdiction, or material irregularity, and an order refusing return of the plaint under Order 7 Rule 10 does not amount to final disposal of the suit merely because forum is affected. The court therefore would not interfere in revision on that basis. A plaint can be rejected under Order 7 Rule 11(d) only when the statutory bar is apparent from the plaint itself; where the bar under Sections 96 and 167 of the Gujarat Co-operative Societies Act depends on disputed facts, including whether the dispute touches the business of the society, summary rejection is unwarranted. The revision was dismissed and the suit was left to proceed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 05 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306640