<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (2) TMI 597 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434082</link>
    <description>SC dismissed the special leave petition and upheld penalty under section 271(1)(c). HC, AO and the Appellate Authority had found that the assessee furnished inaccurate particulars by fabricating cash sales to cloak unaccounted income and wrongfully claim exemption under section 80-IC; the Tribunal&#039;s order deleting the penalty was set aside. The SC declined to interfere with the concurrent factual findings and maintained the penalty levy.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 10:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=704861" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (2) TMI 597 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434082</link>
      <description>SC dismissed the special leave petition and upheld penalty under section 271(1)(c). HC, AO and the Appellate Authority had found that the assessee furnished inaccurate particulars by fabricating cash sales to cloak unaccounted income and wrongfully claim exemption under section 80-IC; the Tribunal&#039;s order deleting the penalty was set aside. The SC declined to interfere with the concurrent factual findings and maintained the penalty levy.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434082</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>