<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (11) TMI 60 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31840</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the order rejecting the refund claim, citing lack of a show cause notice and inadequate communication of grounds. The case was remanded to the Dy. Commissioner for reassessment. The Tribunal emphasized the need to consider Section 67(2) of the Finance Act, 1994, in determining the assessable value for service tax, directing a recalculation to ensure accurate assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 14:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=70486" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (11) TMI 60 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31840</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the order rejecting the refund claim, citing lack of a show cause notice and inadequate communication of grounds. The case was remanded to the Dy. Commissioner for reassessment. The Tribunal emphasized the need to consider Section 67(2) of the Finance Act, 1994, in determining the assessable value for service tax, directing a recalculation to ensure accurate assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31840</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>