<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (2) TMI 592 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434077</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal due to procedural irregularities, lack of concrete evidence supporting the reopening under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, and arbitrary invocation of Explanation - 3 of section 147 for assessment. The addition of unproved amounts under section 68 was deemed unwarranted, emphasizing the requirement for substantiated evidence. The lack of a notice under section 143(2) rendered the reassessment invalid, leading to the appeal&#039;s allowance. The failure to provide an opportunity for cross-examination of accommodation providers was considered a violation of natural justice, resulting in the quashing of the reassessment proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2023 10:30:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=704855" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (2) TMI 592 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434077</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal due to procedural irregularities, lack of concrete evidence supporting the reopening under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, and arbitrary invocation of Explanation - 3 of section 147 for assessment. The addition of unproved amounts under section 68 was deemed unwarranted, emphasizing the requirement for substantiated evidence. The lack of a notice under section 143(2) rendered the reassessment invalid, leading to the appeal&#039;s allowance. The failure to provide an opportunity for cross-examination of accommodation providers was considered a violation of natural justice, resulting in the quashing of the reassessment proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434077</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>