<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (2) TMI 590 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434075</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, allowing 60% depreciation on computer software purchased by the assessee. The distinction between system and application software was deemed irrelevant, with the software qualifying for higher depreciation if meeting the criteria in the Income Tax Rules. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the assessee&#039;s entitlement to the increased depreciation rate.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2023 10:29:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=704852" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (2) TMI 590 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434075</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, allowing 60% depreciation on computer software purchased by the assessee. The distinction between system and application software was deemed irrelevant, with the software qualifying for higher depreciation if meeting the criteria in the Income Tax Rules. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the assessee&#039;s entitlement to the increased depreciation rate.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434075</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>