https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306634 The appeal filed by the assessee against the order of the CIT(A)-5, Bengaluru, relating to Assessment Year 2015-16, was dismissed as unadmitted due to a delay of about 582 days in filing the appeal. The Vice President refused to condone the delay, citing the lack of diligence on the part of the assessee, who only became aware of the dismissal in January 2022. The appeal was ultimately dismissed for failing to meet the required diligence standards in pursuing the appeal process. en-us Wed, 23 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 15 Feb 2023 19:14:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306634 The appeal filed by the assessee against the order of the CIT(A)-5, Bengaluru, relating to Assessment Year 2015-16, was dismissed as unadmitted due to a delay of about 582 days in filing the appeal. The Vice President refused to condone the delay, citing the lack of diligence on the part of the assessee, who only became aware of the dismissal in January 2022. The appeal was ultimately dismissed for failing to meet the required diligence standards in pursuing the appeal process. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 23 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306634