https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306629 In a money suit, a temporary injunction restraining alienation of the defendant's property is not justified merely on a strong prima facie claim where the property is not the subject matter of the suit. Attachment before judgment, or injunction in its nature, requires strict proof of the statutory ingredients, including specific material showing an intention to obstruct or delay execution by disposing of property or removing it from jurisdiction. General financial difficulty or apprehension of non-satisfaction is insufficient. Inherent powers cannot be used to bypass these statutory requirements or create indirect attachment relief where the rules do not permit it. en-us Wed, 14 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 15 Feb 2023 15:29:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306629 In a money suit, a temporary injunction restraining alienation of the defendant's property is not justified merely on a strong prima facie claim where the property is not the subject matter of the suit. Attachment before judgment, or injunction in its nature, requires strict proof of the statutory ingredients, including specific material showing an intention to obstruct or delay execution by disposing of property or removing it from jurisdiction. General financial difficulty or apprehension of non-satisfaction is insufficient. Inherent powers cannot be used to bypass these statutory requirements or create indirect attachment relief where the rules do not permit it. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 14 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306629