<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (2) TMI 541 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434026</link>
    <description>The HC disposed of the writ petition by directing the petitioners to file a reply before the adjudicating authority within three days and requiring the authority to decide penalty liability after granting an opportunity of hearing. The operative effect is that the penalty issue was left to be adjudicated afresh on the basis of the petitioners&#039; reply and after observance of procedural fairness.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2025 12:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=704718" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (2) TMI 541 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434026</link>
      <description>The HC disposed of the writ petition by directing the petitioners to file a reply before the adjudicating authority within three days and requiring the authority to decide penalty liability after granting an opportunity of hearing. The operative effect is that the penalty issue was left to be adjudicated afresh on the basis of the petitioners&#039; reply and after observance of procedural fairness.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434026</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>