<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (2) TMI 539 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434024</link>
    <description>HC ruled on GST Act proceedings where simultaneous summons were issued by Central and State Authorities. The court directed the first respondent to review the subject matter within four weeks, determine if proceedings are identical, and provide a personal hearing to the petitioner. If proceedings are found similar, the first respondent must drop one set of proceedings as per Section 6(2)(b) of GST Act 2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2025 13:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=704716" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (2) TMI 539 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434024</link>
      <description>HC ruled on GST Act proceedings where simultaneous summons were issued by Central and State Authorities. The court directed the first respondent to review the subject matter within four weeks, determine if proceedings are identical, and provide a personal hearing to the petitioner. If proceedings are found similar, the first respondent must drop one set of proceedings as per Section 6(2)(b) of GST Act 2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434024</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>