https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31825 The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal, upholding the decision that royalty payment for the use of technology and know-how does not attract service tax as Engineering Consultancy services. The Tribunal found no merit in the Revenue's arguments, citing precedents such as Navinon Ltd. v. CCE and Toyota Motors Corpn. v. CCE, and affirmed the order setting aside the demand for service tax and penalties on the respondents. en-us Fri, 04 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 29 Apr 2014 14:17:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31825 The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal, upholding the decision that royalty payment for the use of technology and know-how does not attract service tax as Engineering Consultancy services. The Tribunal found no merit in the Revenue's arguments, citing precedents such as Navinon Ltd. v. CCE and Toyota Motors Corpn. v. CCE, and affirmed the order setting aside the demand for service tax and penalties on the respondents. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 04 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31825