<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (2) TMI 517 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434002</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the addition of Rs. 10,00,626 under section 69A of the Income Tax Act was not sustainable either jurisdictionally or on its merits. It found that the Assessing Officer had erred by making the addition in a rectification order rather than in the original assessment order, and that the estimation of cash was based on flawed assumptions and conjectures. Consequently, the Tribunal directed the deletion of the addition, thereby ruling in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2024 17:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=704694" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (2) TMI 517 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434002</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the addition of Rs. 10,00,626 under section 69A of the Income Tax Act was not sustainable either jurisdictionally or on its merits. It found that the Assessing Officer had erred by making the addition in a rectification order rather than in the original assessment order, and that the estimation of cash was based on flawed assumptions and conjectures. Consequently, the Tribunal directed the deletion of the addition, thereby ruling in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=434002</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>