<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (2) TMI 507 - ITAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433992</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed, with the Tribunal deleting the addition on account of unexplained investment in jewellery while upholding the additions on account of unexplained cash and excess stock of Kimam. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of documentary evidence and adherence to CBDT guidelines in such assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2023 11:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=704684" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (2) TMI 507 - ITAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433992</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed, with the Tribunal deleting the addition on account of unexplained investment in jewellery while upholding the additions on account of unexplained cash and excess stock of Kimam. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of documentary evidence and adherence to CBDT guidelines in such assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433992</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>