<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 190 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31821</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the order and remanded the case to the Commissioner (Appeals) for reconsideration, emphasizing the importance of assessing the limitation period in tax liability cases fairly. The decision aimed to ensure a thorough review based on the principles established by the Supreme Court, particularly regarding the disclosure of information in the balance sheet and the intention to evade tax.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 16:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=70467" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 190 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31821</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the order and remanded the case to the Commissioner (Appeals) for reconsideration, emphasizing the importance of assessing the limitation period in tax liability cases fairly. The decision aimed to ensure a thorough review based on the principles established by the Supreme Court, particularly regarding the disclosure of information in the balance sheet and the intention to evade tax.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31821</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>