https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433970 The Court dismissed the writ petition seeking a refund of service tax paid under the SVLDRS-2019 Scheme. The petitioner's claim was deemed invalid as her registration as the proprietor of the firm, tax returns, and voluntary participation in the Scheme indicated her liability. The Court advised the petitioner to resolve any ownership disputes through separate legal proceedings against her husband, who was not involved in the present petition. The Court found no grounds for interference under Article 226 of the Constitution and concluded that the petitioner's arguments did not warrant a refund under the Scheme. en-us Tue, 14 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 15 Feb 2023 08:52:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433970 The Court dismissed the writ petition seeking a refund of service tax paid under the SVLDRS-2019 Scheme. The petitioner's claim was deemed invalid as her registration as the proprietor of the firm, tax returns, and voluntary participation in the Scheme indicated her liability. The Court advised the petitioner to resolve any ownership disputes through separate legal proceedings against her husband, who was not involved in the present petition. The Court found no grounds for interference under Article 226 of the Constitution and concluded that the petitioner's arguments did not warrant a refund under the Scheme. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 14 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433970