https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433959 A disciplinary inquiry under the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 was sustained because the Council and Disciplinary Committee followed the statutory procedure, gave notice and hearing, allowed cross-examination, and considered the evidence and record at both stages. The misconduct findings were treated as falling within the relevant First Schedule clauses and other misconduct, and the proposed reprimand was assessed on proportionality. No procedural infirmity, perversity, or non-consideration of material was found, so the findings and recommended punishment were upheld and there was no ground to interfere with the Council's recommendation. en-us Fri, 10 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 15 Feb 2023 08:51:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433959 A disciplinary inquiry under the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 was sustained because the Council and Disciplinary Committee followed the statutory procedure, gave notice and hearing, allowed cross-examination, and considered the evidence and record at both stages. The misconduct findings were treated as falling within the relevant First Schedule clauses and other misconduct, and the proposed reprimand was assessed on proportionality. No procedural infirmity, perversity, or non-consideration of material was found, so the findings and recommended punishment were upheld and there was no ground to interfere with the Council's recommendation. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 10 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433959