https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306621 The Tribunal held that the demand raised against the appellant for the period April 1993 to October 1994, challenging the classification of furniture as handicraft, was barred by limitation. The Tribunal considered the appellant's bonafide belief in other matters and granted relief based on limitation, maintaining a consistent approach. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal with consequential relief, emphasizing the importance of limitation periods in tax disputes. en-us Tue, 09 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 15 Feb 2023 08:51:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306621 The Tribunal held that the demand raised against the appellant for the period April 1993 to October 1994, challenging the classification of furniture as handicraft, was barred by limitation. The Tribunal considered the appellant's bonafide belief in other matters and granted relief based on limitation, maintaining a consistent approach. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal with consequential relief, emphasizing the importance of limitation periods in tax disputes. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 09 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306621