<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (2) TMI 471 - ITAT PATNA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433956</link>
    <description>A later rectification or calculation order under section 154 could not be used to reopen an unchallenged original intimation under section 200A levying late filing fee under section 234E. Because the earlier intimation had not been appealed against and no mistake apparent from the record or fresh prejudice from the rectification order was shown, the appeals were held not maintainable and were dismissed on the facts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2023 09:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=704642" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (2) TMI 471 - ITAT PATNA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433956</link>
      <description>A later rectification or calculation order under section 154 could not be used to reopen an unchallenged original intimation under section 200A levying late filing fee under section 234E. Because the earlier intimation had not been appealed against and no mistake apparent from the record or fresh prejudice from the rectification order was shown, the appeals were held not maintainable and were dismissed on the facts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433956</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>