<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 189 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31817</link>
    <description>During pendency of the appeal, the requirement to make pre-deposit of the balance service tax demand was waived because the appellant had already paid part of the demanded amount. The operative effect was that no further deposit of the balance demand was required while the appeal remained pending.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=70463" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 189 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31817</link>
      <description>During pendency of the appeal, the requirement to make pre-deposit of the balance service tax demand was waived because the appellant had already paid part of the demanded amount. The operative effect was that no further deposit of the balance demand was required while the appeal remained pending.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31817</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>