<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 188 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31816</link>
    <description>A prima facie view was recorded that repairs and maintenance of a manufacturer&#039;s residential colony had already been treated as input services in an earlier Tribunal ruling, and security agency services for that colony could likewise qualify as input services. On that basis, the issue was treated as arguable and no ground was found to stay the Commissioner (Appeals) order granting Cenvat credit. The revenue&#039;s stay application was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 17:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=70462" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 188 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31816</link>
      <description>A prima facie view was recorded that repairs and maintenance of a manufacturer&#039;s residential colony had already been treated as input services in an earlier Tribunal ruling, and security agency services for that colony could likewise qualify as input services. On that basis, the issue was treated as arguable and no ground was found to stay the Commissioner (Appeals) order granting Cenvat credit. The revenue&#039;s stay application was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31816</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>