<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (5) TMI 227 - HIGH COURT RAJASTHAN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31813</link>
    <description>Where a statute prescribes a minimum penalty, the adjudicating authority and the Tribunal lack jurisdiction to reduce it below that statutory floor. Applying earlier High Court authority, the penalty could not be fixed below the minimum under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994, and the matter was remitted for fresh determination of the penalty within the permissible range. The operative principle is that the minimum penalty set by statute must be respected, and discretion cannot be exercised to go below that limit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 18:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=70459" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (5) TMI 227 - HIGH COURT RAJASTHAN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31813</link>
      <description>Where a statute prescribes a minimum penalty, the adjudicating authority and the Tribunal lack jurisdiction to reduce it below that statutory floor. Applying earlier High Court authority, the penalty could not be fixed below the minimum under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994, and the matter was remitted for fresh determination of the penalty within the permissible range. The operative principle is that the minimum penalty set by statute must be respected, and discretion cannot be exercised to go below that limit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31813</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>