<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (2) TMI 437 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433922</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the appellant was entitled to interest on the refund amount deposited during investigation from the date of expiry of three months from the refund application date until the refund payment date. The impugned order was modified, directing the authority to calculate and pay the interest within two months from the date of the order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2023 08:48:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=704571" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (2) TMI 437 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433922</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the appellant was entitled to interest on the refund amount deposited during investigation from the date of expiry of three months from the refund application date until the refund payment date. The impugned order was modified, directing the authority to calculate and pay the interest within two months from the date of the order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433922</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>