<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 1689 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306608</link>
    <description>Interest received under section 28 of the Land Acquisition Act was treated as part of enhanced compensation, because section 28 amounts are linked to the compensation award itself rather than being separate interest income. By contrast, section 34 amounts are compensation for delay in payment and have a different tax character. On that basis, the receipt was not chargeable as income from other sources and was treated as compensation in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2023 08:48:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=704566" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 1689 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306608</link>
      <description>Interest received under section 28 of the Land Acquisition Act was treated as part of enhanced compensation, because section 28 amounts are linked to the compensation award itself rather than being separate interest income. By contrast, section 34 amounts are compensation for delay in payment and have a different tax character. On that basis, the receipt was not chargeable as income from other sources and was treated as compensation in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306608</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>