<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (6) TMI 818 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306610</link>
    <description>The court granted the Plaintiff an injunction against the fraudulent domain name registrations, acknowledging infringement of statutory and common law rights. It allowed disclosure of registrant information but clarified technical limitations in blocking access to domain names through registrars. The court ordered disclosure of fraudulent bank account details but found dynamic injunctions against future fraudulent registrations technically unfeasible. While rejecting a mechanism for addressing future fraudulent domain names, the court provided a framework for the Plaintiff to approach without formal applications if negotiations with registrars failed, emphasizing cooperation to combat fraudulent practices.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2023 08:48:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=704561" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (6) TMI 818 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306610</link>
      <description>The court granted the Plaintiff an injunction against the fraudulent domain name registrations, acknowledging infringement of statutory and common law rights. It allowed disclosure of registrant information but clarified technical limitations in blocking access to domain names through registrars. The court ordered disclosure of fraudulent bank account details but found dynamic injunctions against future fraudulent registrations technically unfeasible. While rejecting a mechanism for addressing future fraudulent domain names, the court provided a framework for the Plaintiff to approach without formal applications if negotiations with registrars failed, emphasizing cooperation to combat fraudulent practices.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=306610</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>