<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Rules No Road Permit Needed with Valid E-Way Bills, Compliance with Other Formalities Still Required.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=68254</link>
    <description>Seeking road permit for transporting goods/forest products after obtaining e-way bills - This Court is of the opinion that the petitioner is made out a case for interference and it is directed that if the petitioner is in possession of valid e-way bills, road permit should not be insisted upon it, however the petitioner is required to fulfill the other formalities in case, if the situation arises. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2023 20:09:51 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2023 20:09:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=704557" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Rules No Road Permit Needed with Valid E-Way Bills, Compliance with Other Formalities Still Required.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=68254</link>
      <description>Seeking road permit for transporting goods/forest products after obtaining e-way bills - This Court is of the opinion that the petitioner is made out a case for interference and it is directed that if the petitioner is in possession of valid e-way bills, road permit should not be insisted upon it, however the petitioner is required to fulfill the other formalities in case, if the situation arises. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2023 20:09:51 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=68254</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>