<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (12) TMI 15 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31809</link>
    <description>HC held that the statutory requirement to file an audit report under s.10A(5) (mirroring s.80IA(7)/80HHB(3)(ia)) is directory, not mandatory; the tax benefit is available if the audit report is furnished before framing of assessment. Applying precedent, the Court found no substantial question of law and dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal seeking denial of the deduction for late filing of the audit report.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2025 10:16:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=70455" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (12) TMI 15 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31809</link>
      <description>HC held that the statutory requirement to file an audit report under s.10A(5) (mirroring s.80IA(7)/80HHB(3)(ia)) is directory, not mandatory; the tax benefit is available if the audit report is furnished before framing of assessment. Applying precedent, the Court found no substantial question of law and dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal seeking denial of the deduction for late filing of the audit report.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=31809</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>