<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (2) TMI 431 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433916</link>
    <description>HC resolved a dispute regarding road permit requirements for goods transportation post-GST. The Court directed that road permits should not be mandated when valid e-way bills are present, while acknowledging potential additional transportation formalities. The ruling provides interim relief to the petitioner, pending final government determination on road permit regulations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2025 13:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=704512" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (2) TMI 431 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433916</link>
      <description>HC resolved a dispute regarding road permit requirements for goods transportation post-GST. The Court directed that road permits should not be mandated when valid e-way bills are present, while acknowledging potential additional transportation formalities. The ruling provides interim relief to the petitioner, pending final government determination on road permit regulations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433916</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>