<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (2) TMI 417 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433902</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the additions of Rs. 21,57,85,188/- on account of share premium valuation and Rs. 1,36,000/- being expense under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found that the assessee&#039;s transactions fell under the proviso to Section 56(2)(viib) and that the professional fee expense was a regular business expense, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2023 09:41:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=704498" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (2) TMI 417 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433902</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the additions of Rs. 21,57,85,188/- on account of share premium valuation and Rs. 1,36,000/- being expense under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found that the assessee&#039;s transactions fell under the proviso to Section 56(2)(viib) and that the professional fee expense was a regular business expense, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433902</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>