https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433893 The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee's appeal, setting aside the CIT's order regarding the addition of Rs.56,92,000 under section 69A but upheld the CIT's directions for fresh verification of cash deposits from 09/11/2016 to 16/11/2016 and the reversal of deduction under section 11(1)(d). The Tribunal modified the CIT's direction to ensure no double disallowance occurs. en-us Tue, 31 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 13 Feb 2023 09:40:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433893 The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee's appeal, setting aside the CIT's order regarding the addition of Rs.56,92,000 under section 69A but upheld the CIT's directions for fresh verification of cash deposits from 09/11/2016 to 16/11/2016 and the reversal of deduction under section 11(1)(d). The Tribunal modified the CIT's direction to ensure no double disallowance occurs. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 31 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433893