<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (2) TMI 396 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433881</link>
    <description>HC mandamus petition addressed GST payment dispute between a contractor and government entity. Court directed petitioner to submit fresh representation regarding outstanding amount and GST liability within two months. The ruling focused on resolving payment issues through administrative channels rather than judicial intervention, providing an opportunity for detailed reassessment of the contractual GST obligations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2025 13:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=704443" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (2) TMI 396 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433881</link>
      <description>HC mandamus petition addressed GST payment dispute between a contractor and government entity. Court directed petitioner to submit fresh representation regarding outstanding amount and GST liability within two months. The ruling focused on resolving payment issues through administrative channels rather than judicial intervention, providing an opportunity for detailed reassessment of the contractual GST obligations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433881</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>