<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (2) TMI 385 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433870</link>
    <description>The Court quashed the order rejecting the petitioner&#039;s amendment application, citing error in dismissing it based on delay and content merits. Emphasizing that examination of legality should occur after a suit is filed, not before, the Court directed the trial Court to allow the proposed amendment in the counter claim. Respondents were granted liberty to file under Order 7, Rule 11 of the Civil Procedure Code. The writ petition was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2023 09:43:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=704432" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (2) TMI 385 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433870</link>
      <description>The Court quashed the order rejecting the petitioner&#039;s amendment application, citing error in dismissing it based on delay and content merits. Emphasizing that examination of legality should occur after a suit is filed, not before, the Court directed the trial Court to allow the proposed amendment in the counter claim. Respondents were granted liberty to file under Order 7, Rule 11 of the Civil Procedure Code. The writ petition was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Benami Property</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=433870</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>